Technology due diligence is a systematic evaluation of a company's technology assets, team, processes, and risks. It happens before funding rounds (typically Series A and later), acquisitions, and major partnerships.
The outcome directly impacts valuation. Strong technology due diligence can increase a company's valuation by 10-20%. Poor results can kill a deal entirely or significantly reduce the offer.
Having conducted technology due diligence assessments for investors and having been on the receiving end as a CTO, here's what actually matters.
What Technology Due Diligence Covers
1. Architecture and Code Quality
What investors evaluate:
- Is the architecture appropriate for the current scale and the next 10x?
- Is the codebase maintainable (code quality, documentation, test coverage)?
- Are there architecture decisions that will require expensive rework?
- Is the technology stack current and well-supported?
- How much technical debt exists, and is it managed?
What raises red flags:
- Monolithic architecture with no clear path to scale
- Zero or minimal test coverage (< 20%)
- No CI/CD pipeline (manual deployments)
- Outdated technology stack (unmaintained frameworks, end-of-life languages)
- Single points of failure (one server, one database, one person who understands the system)
- Code that nobody can explain
What impresses:
- Clean, well-documented architecture with ADRs (Architecture Decision Records)
- Comprehensive test suite (70%+ coverage with meaningful tests)
- Automated CI/CD with security scanning
- Architecture that demonstrates understanding of scaling challenges
- Clear technical debt register with a management strategy
2. Security and Compliance
What investors evaluate:
- Are there known security vulnerabilities?
- Is customer data properly protected (encryption, access controls)?
- Are compliance requirements met (SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA as applicable)?
- Has the system been penetration tested?
- Is there an incident response plan?
What raises red flags:
- No encryption at rest or in transit
- Hardcoded credentials in the codebase
- No access controls or logging
- No security testing history
- Customer data handling violations
- No compliance certifications when they're expected for the market
What impresses:
- SOC 2 Type II report
- Recent penetration test with remediation evidence
- Security certifications (CISSP, CISM) on the team
- Comprehensive access controls with audit logging
- Vulnerability management programme with SLAs
3. Scalability and Performance
What investors evaluate:
- Can the system handle the projected growth (10x, 100x)?
- What are the current performance characteristics?
- Where are the bottlenecks?
- Is there a scaling plan?
What raises red flags:
- No load testing or performance benchmarks
- Database queries that don't scale (N+1 queries, missing indexes, full table scans)
- Single-server architecture with no horizontal scaling path
- No CDN, no caching strategy, no queuing for async workloads
- "It works for now" without a plan for growth
4. Team and Knowledge
What investors evaluate:
- Does the team have the skills to execute the roadmap?
- Is there key-person dependency (bus factor)?
- What's the team structure and hiring plan?
- Are engineering practices mature (code review, testing, documentation)?
What raises red flags:
- Single person who understands critical systems
- No documentation — everything is tribal knowledge
- High turnover in engineering
- No code review process
- Outsourced core technology with no internal capability to maintain it
What impresses:
- Clear team structure with defined responsibilities
- Internal knowledge sharing (documentation, wikis, architecture discussions)
- Hiring pipeline and defined roles for next 12 months
- Mature engineering practices (code review, testing, CI/CD)
5. Intellectual Property
What investors evaluate:
- Does the company own all its code? (IP assignment agreements with all developers)
- Are open-source licenses compatible with the business model?
- Are there any third-party IP risks?
- Are trade secrets protected?
What raises red flags:
- Missing IP assignment agreements (especially for early contractors)
- Copyleft licenses (GPL) in proprietary product code
- Core functionality built on a third-party platform with unfavourable terms
- Former employer IP contamination risk
6. Infrastructure and Operations
What investors evaluate:
- Is the infrastructure properly managed (Infrastructure as Code)?
- What's the operational maturity (monitoring, alerting, incident response)?
- What are the infrastructure costs and trajectory?
- Is there a disaster recovery plan?
What raises red flags:
- Manual server management (clicking in the cloud console)
- No monitoring or alerting
- No backup strategy or untested backups
- Infrastructure costs growing faster than revenue
- No disaster recovery plan
The Due Diligence Process
Phase 1: Document Review (1-2 weeks)
The investor's technical advisor reviews:
- Architecture documentation
- Technology strategy and roadmap
- Security policies and compliance certificates
- Team structure and org chart
- Infrastructure documentation
- Recent incident reports
- Technical debt assessment
Phase 2: Technical Interviews (2-3 days)
Interviews with:
- CTO/VP Engineering — strategy, architecture vision, team development
- Senior engineers — code quality, technical challenges, process satisfaction
- DevOps/SRE — infrastructure, reliability, operational maturity
- Product/Engineering interface — delivery process, prioritisation
Phase 3: Code and Infrastructure Review (1-2 weeks)
- Codebase analysis (automated tools + manual review)
- Infrastructure architecture review
- Security assessment
- Performance and scalability analysis
- Dependency and license audit
Phase 4: Report and Findings
The DD report typically includes:
- Executive summary with overall assessment (green/amber/red)
- Detailed findings by category
- Risk assessment with severity ratings
- Recommendations for remediation
- Impact on valuation (if applicable)
How to Prepare
6 Months Before (Ongoing Good Practice)
- Maintain architecture documentation (even lightweight)
- Keep test coverage above 70%
- Run automated security scanning
- Manage technical debt with a register
- Ensure all IP assignments are signed
- Conduct annual penetration testing
3 Months Before
- Review and update all technical documentation
- Run a comprehensive code quality analysis and address critical findings
- Verify all compliance certifications are current
- Conduct a self-assessment against the DD criteria above
- Prepare a technology strategy presentation
- Ensure disaster recovery is documented and tested
1 Month Before
- Prepare the data room (architecture docs, security policies, compliance certs, team structure)
- Brief the engineering team on the DD process
- Address any remaining critical findings
- Prepare the CTO for technical interviews (practice explaining architecture and trade-offs)
How Due Diligence Affects Valuation
| Finding | Valuation Impact |
|---|---|
| Strong architecture, clean code, good security | +10-20% (technology is an asset) |
| Average — some debt, some gaps, but manageable | Neutral |
| Significant technical debt requiring major investment | -10-20% |
| Critical security issues or IP problems | Deal-breaker or -30%+ |
| Key-person dependency on single engineer | -5-15% (risk premium) |
| No tests, no CI/CD, no documentation | -15-25% (cost to remediate) |
Technology due diligence is a critical milestone in a startup's journey. Preparation makes the difference between a technology advantage and a technology liability. If you need help preparing for due diligence or conducting a technology assessment, let's talk.